Mar 23

Bologna: Michael Eisner

The absolute wrong way to forward a third party movement. A clue should have been the author of this piece, a beyond wealthy white man who was schooled privately from kindergarten. So, if the American people decide using the methodology devised by this group that it wishes to move in a certain direction, and that direction is hit by a bus, we get to immediately move in the opposite direction?

To help ensure that this candidate will be a problem-solver who represents the great majority of American society rather than fringes or the special interests, he or she will be required to pick a running mate from a different party. For example, if the candidate is a Republican, the running mate might be a Democrat or an independent.

This is idiocy and theatrics, not a foundation for true separation–or even a first step–from the two-party system. It’s no surprise that a man charged for many years with producing drivel is it’s loudest mouthpiece. Please take your project home and come in tomorrow with a new idea, or I’ll have to give you an F.